| Home Page | |||||||||||||
TABLE
11.3 SERVICE FACTORS
|
|||||||||||||
TABLE 1.14 LUBRICATION FACTORS
|
|||||||||||||
The loading conditions assumed
by the original Lewis equation are very conservative.
A modification that results in a more realistic situation was made by Dudley
(Reference 3), that takes into account multiple teeth sharing load. When the
contact ratio factor is added as well, the modified Lewis equation becomes:
Wt
= mpSFY
(
600 )
for steel
gears
(54)
Pd
600+V
where the contact ratio m takes into account the
fact that
when the load is at the tip of the tooth, it is shared by a second pair of
teeth.
The following tables are useful in determining gear load
ratings:
Table 1.15
: Ratings for steel spur gears
Tables 1.16 & 1.17 :
Ratings for small-pitch spur gears
Table 1.18
: Ratings for hardened steel helical gears
Tables 1.19 & 1.20 :
Ratings of worms and worm gears.
13.2 Dynamic Strength
Equations 52 and 54 give adequate results for gear meshes
that are in a static situation. When gears are in action, however, tooth loading
is greater than the static value due to dynamic effects. In a gear system,
dynamic forces arise from a combination of the masses involved, their elasticity
and the forcing function representing the prescribed motion. Inaccuracies in
gear-tooth profiles cause accelerations and decelerations during gear action
which reflect as inertia forces, and can greatly exceed static tooth loading.
The severity of dynamic forces is a function of pitch-line velocity and tooth
errors.An accurate prediction of dynamic forces is very difficult.
Various factors and formulas have beer, devised to increase the static tooth
force to a value that safety represents the dynamic condition. A
T82 Next Page